Research & insights

Work in progress, published as it is ready.

This is the publication record of a new research initiative. Nothing has been published yet. As methodology papers, design notes and benchmark studies are completed, they will appear here — including the parts that did not work.

  • 0 publications to date
  • Inaugural cycle in development
  • Peer review welcomed

Forthcoming

Listed items are planned work
Not yet available for citation

In preparation

Methodology

A framework for assessing graduate AI readiness

The conceptual basis for the proposed capability domains, and the reasoning behind a task-based rather than attitudinal approach.

FutureMeasure

In preparation

Design note

Designing assessment tasks that resist model assistance

Practical questions that arise when an assessment must measure judgement in an environment where a model can attempt the task for the student.

FutureMeasure

Planned

Domain review

Critical evaluation and verification as a graduate capability

A review of what verification actually requires in professional practice, and why it is poorly captured by confidence measures.

FutureMeasure

Planned

Sector briefing

What universities are being asked to evidence

An outline of the external expectations — employer, accreditor and council — that graduate readiness evidence is beginning to answer.

FutureMeasure

Reference base

Every figure we cite is dated and linked.

7 published studies sit behind the claims on this site. Select an entry to read what it found.

Publication year → publisher → finding

Each marker opens the original publication.

FutureMeasure is independent of these organisations. References identify the published evidence base, not endorsement.

Fig. 05 — Source material

Editorial position

We will publish what the evidence supports, and say what it does not.

A benchmark is a claim about the world, and claims deserve scrutiny. Every publication from FutureMeasure will state its method, its sample, its limitations and the inferences it does not license.

Where results are provisional, they will be labelled as provisional. Where an instrument behaved unexpectedly, we intend to report that too — it is usually the most useful thing a reader learns.

Collaboration

Contribute to the inaugural research programme.

We are seeking academic collaborators and institutional research partners for the first cycle, including reviewers and pilot sites.